Comments on: Fixed or multi zoom hunting scope?

By: akluis

akluis — Sun, 11 May 2008 11:27:40 +0000

fixed magnification scopes are normally lighter and stronger. Also, for the same dollar value, fixed magnification is usually a better quality optic.

that being said, a 3-9x 40mm scope is a pretty standard and useful hunting scope. However, a scope isn’t a good place to pinch pennies. I’d suggest a leupold or nikon or other good quality optic.

At one time BSA scopes were a real great value, but they have since gone down greatly in workmanship quality.

By: dca2003311@yahoo.com

dca2003311@yahoo.com — Fri, 09 May 2008 14:54:51 +0000

Muti-zoom of course, preferably a 3 to 9 power.* Burris makes great scopes.*

By: John de Witt

John de Witt — Tue, 06 May 2008 18:55:48 +0000

When I started hunting, the standard answer would have been a fixed-power scope, either 2 1/2x for woods hunting or 4x for open areas. Variable-power scopes were not likely to shoot to the same point of aim at low power as at high, and they were prone to fogging and other malfunctions. None of that applies any more, and a 2-7x or 3-9x variable is the choice for most. Burris isn’t a bad scope, but the comparably priced Leupold will, in most peoples’ opinion, be a better value. Since elk are pretty large critters, my elk-class rifles tend to wear the Leupold VariX II 2-7x.

By: larry

larry — Mon, 05 May 2008 04:13:02 +0000

Burris makes good scopes. The 3X9 variable type covers the two most common hunting situations. The lower power allows one to get a fast sight picture (hopefully) on briefly offered shots at moderately close range, often on moving game. The higher power allows for long distance shots, perhaps on that wounded or otherwise spooked animal. We need both. I can’t fathom why so many hunters put a fixed 4 power scope on, as it’s a bit too strong for quick closer shots, and not “reaching” enough for that longer shot. Regards, Larry.

By: cdslsmn

cdslsmn — Fri, 02 May 2008 20:58:26 +0000

A multi-power scope is defintely the way to go. You have to be adjustable in order to fit every shot you may be taking. Remember that a 40 yard shot can be just as hard as a 400 yard shot if you have the right scope. I suggest a Leupold. If you are looking for something a little more inexpensive look at the Cabela’s guide series scopes. They are a good product and generally priced fairly. Also the 40mm objective is the smallest I would get. Try to hold out for the 50mm. It gathers more light and therefore is much clearer in low light situations. I have a 3.5 – 10 x 50mm and it is brighter in the evening than the ***** eye. That is important when you are shooting at a trophy deer or elk.

By: boruma35

boruma35 — Thu, 01 May 2008 11:34:56 +0000

Elk hunting often requires shots of 200 yards or more, depending on where you hunt. A variable power scope is much better for these situations than a fixed low power one is. Get the best scope you can afford, Weaver, Leupold, Nikon, Mueller, Bushnell, et.c. are all good scopes. The main differences in the lower quality scopes and the good ones are clarity, ability to handle shock, moisture resistance, and light transmission will all be better with a top quality scope. With a long shot these factors become very important.

By: BlueCornChrome

BlueCornChrome — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:45:58 +0000

I like multiple magnifications because range varies on different hunting setups. I shoot two different rifles, both with 3X9 40 mm objectives. I think they are the most versatile. Fixed magnification is more valuable for known short range situations (tactical scopes are often fixed magnification). A Burris scope is fine. I wouldn’t pick one, but I could sure use one comfortably. My preference would be Leupold or Nikon.